12.17.2011

the miserable truth of Mies van der Rohe

As promised from my review of Mies van der Rohe by Claire Zimmerman: Some of Mies' key projects.

[Side note: I'm getting a lot of hits on this post, probably because the post title includes the words "miserable truth". I used the words "miserable truth" because of the roots of his name (mies ~ miserable, rohe ~ truth) and because some (I'm not one of them...) consider modern architecture (of which "truth" and "honesty" is important) miserable. Enjoy!]

The first date is the design date; the second date is the construction completion date.

These first five are from Mies' "Five Projects" period, none of them built.

1921: Friedrichstrasse (unbuilt)



1922: Glass Skyscraper (unbuilt)






1923: Concrete office building (unbuilt)

1923: Concrete country house (unbuilt)

1924: Brick country house (unbuilt) The floorplan is iconic in architectural circles.




1925-1927: Wolf House 





1925-1927: The Dwelling (Stuttgart, Germany)


1927-1930: Lange and Esters Houses (Krefield, Germany)





1928-1930: Tugendhat House (Brno, Czech Republic)



1928-1929: Barcelona Pavilion (Barcelona, Spain)




1945-1951: Farnsworth House (Plano, Illinois)




1954-1958: Seagram Building (New York, New York)

1962-1968: New National Gallery (Berlin, Germany)






12.12.2011

haiku for the book “Mies van der Rohe” by Claire Zimmerman


born in Germany,
his buildings are barely there.
less is more, he said...

Its appropriate to summarize a book about Mies with haiku: haiku is poetry thats barely there where less is, indeed, more.

Born Maria Ludwig Michael Meis in 1886 in Aachen, Germany, Meis trained to be a draftsman and eventually worked his way to Berlin and the architectural offices of Bruno Paul (in 1906) and Peter Behrens (in 1908). In 1912, Mies started his own office. Between 1915 and 1918, he served in the German military, after which he returned to his practice. His work during this period was nothing special.

A critical point in Mies career came when Walter Gropius rejected his submission to the Exhibition of Unknown Architects in 1919 for not being Modern enough. Mies used that rejection to fuel a re-evaluation of his theoretical foundation and embark on a philosophical and architectural phase between 1921 and 1924 called Five Projects by historians. Five Projects encompasses Mies full conversion into Modernism as well as his extension of it. This period includes designs of two high rises, a mid-rise, (these previous three are notable for how ahead-of-their-time they were) and two houses. None of the five projects was built. As part of reinventing himself, he rechristened himself Mies van der Rohe, the Rohe coming from his mothers maiden name. (As an aside, Mies infers, in German, miserable while Rohe infers pure, so his name can be literally read as miserable truth!)

During his theoretical explorations, he wrote We know no forms, only building problems. Form is not the goal but the result of our work. There is no form in and for itself... Form as a goal is Formalism; and that we reject. Nor do we strive for a style. ...it is our specific concern to liberate building activity from aesthetic speculators and make building again what alone it should be, namely BUILDING. (When I read this passage to my bride, she swooned. Mies is her favorite architect.). Mies further called for ...absolute truthfulness and rejection of all cheating. And, in an indication of how much fun he was at cocktail parties during this time, he wrote that The nature of the technical is determined in its fulfillment... He who builds a factory as if it were a temple lies and disfigures the landscape.

By 1926, Mies had come to realize that aesthetics and creativity had a place in architecture and that how people responded to space was as important as the space itself. His response to this realization was creating structures that allowed flexibility of interior space, explicit connections to exterior space through glass walls, and choreographing the architectural experience. In 1927 he showed a Glass Room at a Stuttgart exhibition that earned a lot of attention and noteriety. Other notable efforts in 1927 were the Weissenhofsiedlung apartment building [also in Stuttgart] and the Wolf House in Guben, Germany. He expanded on the concept of a glass room in 1928 with Villa Tugendhat in Brno, Czech Republic, and in 1929 with the German Pavilion in Barcelona (Mies also designed the chairs for the pavilion, now known as the iconic Barcelona chairs) and ultimately perfected the concept with the Farnsworth House in Plano, Illinois, in 1945 (for a house) and with the New National Gallery in Berlin in 1962 (for an institutional structure). It is through what he learned and developed in 1926 and 1927 that guided much of his career afterwards.

Starting in 1933, with the rise of Hitler's National Socialist Party and its preference for neoclassicism, many German Modernists left the country. Mies remained until 1938 (running Bauhaus out of a warehouse for a short while), when restrictions on his work and concern for his safety led him to Chicago and the directorship of the Illinois Institute of Technology. Mies reputation in the United States had been established by Mies inclusion in Philip Johnsons influential International Style exhibition at MoMA in 1932 and Johnsons continued fascination with Mies.
Mies and the United State were, in many ways, perfect for each other. With decisions primarily directed by the almighty dollar, Mies almost pure utilitarian approach with an emphasis on flexibility of space fit perfectly. Under these conditions, Mies helped invent the modern skyscraper, first exploring his vision with the Lake Shore Drive apartments in Chicago in 1948 and perfecting it with the Seagram Building in 1954.

Mies continued to work and explore his tenents of Modernism until his death in 1969 in Chicago. Although not mentioned in the book, Mies is credited with coining the phrases Less is more. and God is in the details. He also said of his own work My architecture is barely there.
This is the first of the Taschen architect series that I bought (picked it up at the Marfa book store which has a far better architecture section than any bookstore in Austin) based in large part on the recommendation of Bob Borson over at Life of an Architect (a wonderfully witty blog, btw!). The books are smallish soft covers but only 10 bucks and chock full of info including a biographical overview, vignettes on critical projects, career timeline, maps, further reading, and gorgeous photography. Highly recommended! Im hoping Santa baby brings me more!

status update


I haven't written much about the Architect 2.0 search in part because I want to wait until we've made a decision before writing about it. But here's a quick update without the gory details.

We've talked to four architects now: Architect 2a(i) and Architect 2a(ii) (yes, we're going to tattoo the underside of their lips with serial numbers like race horses...), Architect 2b, Architect 2c, and Architect 2d. Architect 2c, although quite lovely, is unfortunately way too much of a financial stretch to work (and yes, we tried stretching). Architect 2a(i) was recommended by a friend, but he has joined forces with Architect 2a(ii), hence the complicated sub-numbering of the specimens. We have one more (Architect 2e) to talk to before making a decision, something we plan to do over the holidays. Was it Mae West that said "So many architects, so little time!"?

Got a topo and tree survey done (post coming soon) but still need to get geotechnical done.

(photo by mwah, Terlingua, Texas, November 2011)

12.07.2011

san antonio modern homes tour


This Saturday. See the Alamo and then see some blocky stuff:

http://sanantonio.modernhometours.com/

(photo scarfed from tour site)

12.05.2011

mmmm Marfa: I cube you















Every year we head out to Far West Texas, my favorite part of the state, for Thanksgiving with my bride's folks. Marfa has become a destination spot for minimalists, in large part due to Judd's presence and the ensuing Donald Judd worship that ensued after his death. My bride and I dream about retiring and opening a motel for New York hipsters with individual units based on Judd's concrete blocks and serving literal "square" meals for breakfast. At the very least, we expect to build a Judd-style picnic table for our Austin backyard...

(photos by mwah)


12.03.2011

sketch your house in SketchUp!







SketchUp is a badass 3D modeling program initially developed by @last software, later bought and now maintained by Google. Its badass because its (a) badass and (b) free. Thats right, FREE! And while free is oftentimes cheesy, especially in 3D modeling, this program is pretty sophisticated and, based on my review of various architectural blogs, its used quite a bit in the industry (there is a pay-for-pro version). The other badass aspects of SketchUp are that (c) it has a realtively short learning curve and (d) its available for both Windows and Mac platforms. Furthermore, 3D models of furniture, cars, people, and other stuff are crowdsourced, so theres a lot of stuff out there already put together and ready to plop into designs.

I learned and used SketchUp when we were considering a lot in northwest Austin, a lot we called the Cliff Lot. The Cliff Lot had a great deal of topography, was fully treed, and was bounded on three sides by drainage. A jump off the edge of the lot combined with one to two days of exposure (depending on when the coyotes arrived) would fulfill your suicidal ambitions.

We were (probably) one counter offer from being under contract when the neighbor took a small bulldozer to the lot to cut a path through trees, into the hill side, and across a city-recognized drainage to get to his back yard (he was hauling a bunch of limestone block back there for a major landscaping project). The lot-owner was unusually (suspiciously?) calm when all this was revealed and tried to convince us that the unsilt-screened landmoving and tree removal shouldnt be a problem for us or the city. When we said that was fine but we wanted to have the city come out to verify that there werent any code violations we would be inheriting, the owner said no, so bye-bye lot. Soon after I discovered SketchUp and thought What the heck: Ill design a house for that lot!

Part of the purpose for doing this was to (1) learn SketchUp, (2) get an understanding of how much space we might need in a new home, and (3) get a more detailed appreciation for what it is that architects do. And I have to say, it was a hoot!

The first thing I did after I got serious was figure out the floorplan. Because of the topography (the lot falls off from the street) I knew the garage had to be off street level. After that, it was waterfalling the house down the grade of the lot. The middle part of the house, grade-wise, contains the public areas (kitchen-dining-living-0.5 bath); the upper part holds two bedrooms and an open office-library; and the bottom holds the master suite. Ive also included an image of an earlier version that I put together without the benefit of a floorplan. I put that gangplank in there, suspended in air, to be able to literally walk out into the trees (10 to 20 feet up into the air). Saw later that Wright did something similar at Taliesan East (and here I thought I was being creative).

I have to confess that I havent use the software since, in large part to let the expert do what the expert is supposed to do (The Architect had free reign on the floorplan and massing as dictated by the program on the current lot). Nonetheless, having danced with design on a lot we werent going to build on helped me understand and appreciate the symphony an architect has to direct to get all the pieces to effortlessly work together. I am, by no means, suggesting I succeeded in directing that symphony with this effort; if anything, my effort is a cacophony of kazoos! But it felt good to wave the wands and create something out of thin air