We’ve
yapped about precedents in various blog posts, so it seems appropriate to
present our precedents on Presidents’ Day. A precedent is “an act or instance
that may be used as an example in dealing with subsequent similar instances.”
So in architecture, a precedent is a building, a finish, or a solution that
came before that can be used to guide a solution in the here and now or in the
future. In our case, we used precedents to define our stylistic preferences.
It’s unclear to me whether or not architects like to see client-provided
precedents or not. Michael Malone, in “The Architect’s Guide to Residential
Design”, suggests the answer is “No”:
“During
your initial interviews [potential clients] will usually tell you up front what
they are looking for; some may even have books or magazines with specific
houses or, even worse, various elements of houses they fully expect to see
incorporated into their new home.”
I’m
fixated a wee bit on that “even worse” bit, which suggests architects don’t
want you lugging your books and magazines into their offices, thank you very
much. Ultimately, I think every architect’s preference is to have a (book-less,
magazine-less) client walk in their office, slap a pile of cash on their desk,
and yelp, in a Zsa Zsa Gabor voice, “Design me a house!”
We
assembled and distributed our list of precedents to potential architects for
our project before we read Malone’s book. But truth be told, we still would
have done it after reading Malone’s book. The Zsa Zsa Gabor approach would make
me nervous unless I knew that I would love whatever the architect came up with.
And even then, that’s a risk. What if Mr. Cubist Architect was having a
mid-life crisis and decided all his projects would now be Beaux Arts, and you
were the first “beneficiary” of this revelation? On the other hand, what if you
were courting International Style architects with what you were expecting would
be a gothic castle with a Minnie Mouse themed landscape design? It seems to me getting the broad style questions and
expectations settled early, before contracts are signed, is important.
What
Malone may be concerned about is the potential specificity of a client’s
request. If you go into an architect’s office with a photo of a house and state
“I want my house to look exactly like this house”, that’s a problem. That house
may not fit your program, your site, your orientation, or your budget and may
trample on the creativity of the architect you’re talking to as well as the
architect who designed the house you like (not to mention the folks who built a
house they thought was unique).
No comments:
Post a Comment